And if companies continue to conduct animal testing, there would be more protests on the kind of experiments done on animals. Isn't it then, as inhuman to experiment on such animals as it is to experiment on human beings themselves? With the advances in science, many discoveries were made. Animal models serve as tools in studying the aspects of infectious diseases. Thus, it is important to continue animal research because there is 1634 Words 6 Pages The pros and cons of personality testing Introduction The test that measure a person's enduring traits and their characteristics, which are nonphysical and nonmental is referred to as a personality test. This excludes birds, fish, rats, cold blood animals and farm animals regardless of warm or cold blooded from experimentation and testing. That testing ensure that pets are less likely to experience a negative reaction to those medications.
That the researchers take efforts to minimize the suffering of these animals doesn't really sound convincing, as they are kept in isolated cages, infected with various diseases, and tortured with various chemicals - all in the name of research. Without much choice, the students put the dog to sleep. Animals have been the center of testing for thousands of years. That means there are more than 20 million animals who could be at a high risk of abuse or neglect in the name of research. Let's shake it up a little. As the statistics indicate animal testing is dangerous and harmful, but medical research must continue. In vitro in glass testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used.
There would have been no way to lower the risk of organ transplant being rejected. The practice of animal testing entails pros and cons that both sides must take into consideration. Many of those animals are purposely bred for the experiments being performed as well, which means millions of animals are at a higher risk of suffering from abuse or neglect in a field that is often poorly regulated. An undeniable con of animal testing is the lost of many animal lives, those animals who do not die in tests are put to sleep. These include birds, fish, mice and rats. The benefits and improvements to modern medicine as a result of animal testing should be weighed heavily against the harmful and toxic ingredients used in such experiments and their detrimental effects on test subjects like rats and mice.
Although the arguments presented about the wrongness or rightness of such practice vary, the choice on which to believe depends on people themselves. But then, we can easily do away with the use of animals for cosmetic testing or other similar procedures - which definitely amount to inhumane behavior on our part. Scientists should test on microorganisms instead of poor innocent, animals. Animal Experiments It has been estimated that approximately, 20 million animals are being used for testing and are killed annually; about 15 million of them are used to test for medication and five million for other products. Animal Experiments The most radical progress in reproductive medicine such as oral contraceptives, in vitro fertilization, hormone replacement therapy, etc.
. Office of Technology Assessment 270. This is the main reason why, despite the number of animals that have to be sacrificed, the scientific community and a portion of the public support animal testing. Furthermore, it was reported that information obtained from experiments could be maximized while the suffering of animals are minimized United States. It costs a lot of money. In particular is the case in the Beijing facility of the Bridge Pharmaceuticals Inc, which was among drug companies to set up centers in China. A poll of 3,748 scientists by the Pew Research Center found that 89% favored the use of animals in scientific research.
In order to do so, they have publicized a number of animal tests that were urgently distasteful to the public, even if they were not examples of the norm in research: In the late 1990s in England at Huntingdon Life Sciences facility, employees were recorded hitting and screaming at dogs, as well as doing sexually repulsive things during the taking of blood samples. It is reported that because of animal testing, nine new medicines and eight treatments are in the process of being created from product testing on animals. Animal Experiments Currently, questions have been raised about the ethics surround animal testing. The product may harm or benefit the animal, but not a human. Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are like us.
There are better vaccines for rabies, amongst many others, and treatments for feline leukemia. Some of the most beneficial things that have come from medical testing on animals are Penicillin, various asthma treatments, and insulin. Though animal composition is not completely similar to human beings, it is just sufficient for scientists to use on tests to see how cosmetics would work on humans. Here's a look into the upside of animal testing. However, these companies were not the only ones thrown into spotlight for their use of animals.
Welcome, New Hive Oity graduating class of… …9:15. This allows us to raise necessary awareness about the processes of pathogenesis and its prevention by vaccination and chemotherapy. These 'products', which range from prescription drugs to cosmetics, are tested on animals to check for the degree of skin irritation, skin penetration, eye irritation, carcinogenicity, etc. Animal tests are very expensive and this is considered by some, mostly researchers on a strict budget, as a con. If companies stop using animals, there would be no greater chances to develop new drugs for diseases.
However, these products could be potentially hazardous for humans or for the environment. Birds and fish are used less frequently. At the same time, some types of testing subject animals to cruel and inhumane procedures, offsetting, in the eyes of animal-testing opponents, any benefits of animal testing to humans. These were the periods characterized by the acceptance of the scientific point of view and the explosion of technology from it. In many countries, it is mandatory for drugs to be tested on animals before they are sold in the market, so as to minimize their side effects. While the United States, Europe and India have political and religious issues that prevent the establishment or expand of animal-testing laboratories, other countries such as China are more lenient.