Let the story sit a while before embarking on a second reading. The same goes for the basic narrative structure: the succession of events that make up the story is quite straightforward and transparent. On the contrary, the hunger artist declared that he could fast just as well as in earlier times—a claim that was entirely credible. A major motion picture was released titled The Hunger Games, after the first book in the series, and it instantly became a box office hit. Troscianko begins with the end of her story: what made her finally overcome anorexia. Her protests of the unfairness of the process — a thought that has only now occurred to her. Anyone who can dream of it can write of it.
The claim could be made that forcing a certain form of superiority on a certain group or an individual is instinct, but it is not. The artist as a suffering figure is nothing new; most art, it could be argued, and especially Kafka's writing, emerges from suffering. The very last paragraph does a good job of bringing the story to an end. The story itself is somewhat labyrinthine, the very first paragraph is misleading, talking about a World War I event almost irrelevant to the story. This shows the hunger artist as an inverted Christ figure but in a different way from Tess. The prose is very liberally salted with semicolons; the paragraphs are enormous; and in the first paragraph alone, there is a 245-word sentence! The impresario came forward, without a word--for the band made speech impossible--lifted his arms in the air above the artist, as if inviting Heaven to look down upon its creature here in the straw, this suffering martyr, which indeed he was, although in quite another sense; grasped him around the emaciated waist, with exaggerated caution, so that the frail condition he was in might be appreciated; and committed him to the care of the blenching ladies, not without secretly giving him a shaking so that his legs and body tottered and swayed. There is a parallel between the hunger artist and Jesus Christ.
Stop and do some reflection on this before going further. Might the audience's shift in the category of object or spectacle that earns their admiration - whether grudging and limited in the case of the Hunger Artist in the old days or spontaneous and tenacious in the case of the panther in the new era - be a symptom of a change in values at work within the culture at large? They made his fasting terribly difficult. His father was a shopkeeper and tried to climb up the social ladder by working hard at his shop and sending Franz to a prestigious German high school. One of Kafka's major topics in his other works and here is the negative effect industrialization and capitalism has on art. My second thought was that while Kafka emphasizes to us that the hunger artist is misunderstood, he makes practically no attempt to explain the hunger artist's art to the reader. It is hard to stress the importance of this point too much. He was quite happy at the prospect of spending a sleepless night with such watchers; he was ready to exchange jokes with them, to tell them stories out of his nomadic life, anything at all to keep them awake and demonstrate to them that he had no eatables in his cage and that he was fasting as not one of them could fast.
After all, the Hunger Artist's public image and the panther are seeming to shape up, for us, as embodiments of significantly different ideals of strength. An overseer's eye fell on the cage one day and he asked the attendants why this perfectly good cage should be left standing there unused with dirty straw inside it; nobody knew, until one man, helped out by the notice board, remembered about the hunger artist. However, she is different from Christ. I enjoyed this story, but I'm not sure I'd like to read it again. Kafka proves to be ahead of his time in managing to frame it in the context of isolation, lack of understanding from others, etc.
They do not believe him when he says he is not cheating, but rather try to disprove that by finding faults or some ways by which he can smuggle in food. While the hunger artist was powerless and slowly became weaker and weaker as his fast progressed, the panther was the complete embodiment of power and vitality. We see this thoroughly throughout the story, and in fact, this is a huge component of the story. Please send your comments to. His only wish was to achieve artistic perfection, which in his mind, meant to be able to fast indefinitely.
The hunger of the Hunger Artist is not for food. However, the Hunger Artist in Kafka's A Hunger Artist places a different, more complex meaning to this word, making the Hunger Artist's name rather ironic. However, Impresario interrupts his numerous fasts whenever he intends to extend them beyond forty days, which will earn him immense admiration from the people. A major reason for the demise of the hunger artist was his pride. No one could possibly watch the hunger artist continuosly, day and night, and so no one could produce first-hand evidence that the fast had really been rigorous and continuous; only the artist himself could know that, he was therefore bound to be the sole completely satisfied spectator of his own fast. Tributes are people who live in the districts. These are the themes that Kafka addresses in The Hunger Artist with spectacular use of hidden meanings and enigmatic parable.
. All they care about is entertainment. Much more to his taste were the watchers who sat up close to the bars, who were not content with the dim night lighting of the hall but focused him in the full glare of the electric pocket torch given them by the impresario. The only contact he has with others is thrusting his arm out of the cage to allow others a sense of awe at his thinness. She is an embodiment of Christ figure. On fine days the cage was dragged out into the open air, and then the hunger artist was put on display particularly for the children. While Gregor may define the dictionary definition, his sister is the essence of a metamorphosis.
Peeta can be best characterized by his love for Katniss and willingness to sacrifice himself for her. But in his cage they put a young panther. At first after Gregor morphed into a bug, it seems as if Grete is that only one who cares for her brother, even though he has the body of a giant bug. But then there happened yet again what always happened. His pleasure arises from knowing that he has complete control over his hunger and suffering and he can exercise this free will to push his body past the regular boundaries and obtain the highest degree of perfection. His pride allowed him to improve his fasting but it had a negative impact on the preliminary purpose of putting on a good show. Sometimes you will have to stop and rethink how parts connect with each other -- how the questions posed arise out of a combination of details of the story and assumptions that the reader that is, the one presupposed by the story brings to bear upon the story, how those assumptions are argued for, how answers to earlier questions give rise to subsequent questions, etc.